The most typical thing about the Sarkozy "reforms" are that they are no-money propositions. This is in spite of the fact that biggest problem with French universities is that on the Western scale they are poor.
The "reforms" are cost-free substitutes for better funding. Among other things, they
- enhance the powers of each university president to reallocate the time and functions of teacher-researchers
- increase the teaching hours of researchers
The same cheapness was also the case for Germany's "Elite 10" program for creating a German Ivy League. The idea came in the first place from the methodologically bad world rankings cranked out by Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The literal bait was utterly puny - 13.5 million Euros per year per winning campus through 2011. 37 universities turned themselves upside down to apply for money that would add about 5% to the research funds of an ordinary medium-sized campus in the United States. The real incentive was the status of the "German Ivy League" label. More accurately, the incentive was avoiding defeat and demotion to a lower university caste. The outcomes are always the same:
- less pressure to spend real money, in this case to improve Germany's overall higher education system.
- university personnel distracted from common advancement by competition
- rankings that justify fewer resources for the newly-invented lower orders
- less development for society overall.
0 comments:
Join the Conversation
Note: Firefox is occasionally incompatible with our comments section. We apologize for the inconvenience.