• Home
  • About Us
  • Guest Posts

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

Working in Non-Harvard Higher Ed

The biggest mainstream media higher ed story last week--and this--has been the lawsuit charging Harvard with discrimination against  Asian American applicants. My piece on it has been delayed by my study of the documents, which has changed my mind from pro to con on Harvard admissions.  We may be seeing the end of the Powell Era's frustrating but functional compromise on race in college admissions, in part thanks to the Harvard practices that created it.  More on that soon.  Meanwhile, the other big higher ed story last week was confirmation of the shockingly un-Harvard conditions in the rest of higher education.

The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) released some data snapshots last week, reporting (again) that 73 percent of instructional positions are non-tenure track (NTT). In spite of the hundred or hundreds of applicants per tenure track job, academic work isn't a great thing for most of the people doing it.  By that I mean that college teaching is mostly precarious and is a proverbial middle class job only for a minority.

State legislatures and others regularly lament the inefficiencies of tenure, but it is mostly gone:  fewer than 20 percent of post-secondary instructors actually have it.   The public image of the privileged "college professor" lags decades behind the common reality. 

The employment structure also changes the nature of universities. Neither academic freedom nor faculty governance can have much general impact when only a quarter to a fifth of "the faculty" are in a position to exercise them.

This pie chart for the best case scenario-- Research 1 universities--is startling.
What most people think of as professors are only 30 percent of teaching staff. About the same share are grad students. These proportions don't say "only PhDs can teach university students." Nor do they say "university professors must be engaged in their own research." And these numbers
 are for the most research-oriented universities.

At the same time, R1s offer multi-year contracts to a much higher percentage of their NTT faculty than do non-doctoral institutions (2/3rds at R1s, half at R2).  (See Colleen Flaherty's Inside Higher Ed overview for this and related points). And yet even these NTT faculty teach 2-3 times more courses per year than TT faculty and are paid less: one UC official recently praised their "teaching power," meaning the cost-benefit advantages of their high teaching loads.

Continued austerity means that public university administrators no longer imagine replacing NTT with TT faculty, who have research and governance obligations, and whose lower teaching loads give them more time to do intensive, personalized teaching.  These are the university's three core public goods--creating knowledge, spreading knowledge, and governing knowledge in the general interest.  Keeping most faculty contingent diminishes all of these.

College teaching is also frequently hunger work. Postsecondary teaching conditions are often unethical, exploitative, and cruel.  See, for one of many recent example, the excellent "Going Hungry at the Most Prestigious MFA in America" (h/t Audrey Watters).

More public-good damage: look at the teaching conditions in community colleges.

2/3rds of community college instructors work part time.  It doesn't matter how brilliant or dedicated they are: teaching loads in CCs are 5 courses per term, and for part-timers five generally don't add up to a living wage in any one place.  A typical CC student will have 2 of 3 courses taught by a part-timer, and only 1 in 8 taught by a tenured professor.

Again, the instructors can be superbly skilled and dedicated and yet lack the working conditions to deliver.  CCs have the worst completion rates in the nation, which is partly tied to a mostly non-permanent teaching force that doesn't know each student well enough to give them personalized attention.

In their general indifference to teaching and learning quality, policymakers love CCs, ostensibly for linking their minority-majority student bodies directly to middle-skill jobs. But CCs aren't working well, and their temp teaching staffs and excessive teaching lords are two major reasons why.  (I say this in full awareness of two generations of transfers to UCSB telling me about beloved instructors at their CC: great people teach great classes there, just not at scale.)  I know of no state legislature that is worried about instructor working conditions at CCs, and the reason is that politicians really like CCs because they're cheap.


The obvious danger is this: if the majority experience of college converges with their experience of high school, the public will pay less, not more--as will the students themselves.  Politics, ethics, and knowledge aside, quality upgrades are the only business answer. It is not to be found in these employment charts.

While everyone (or at least readers of the New York Times and WeChat) obsess about Harvard admissions, it's worth remembering that 38 percent of Asian American and Pacific Islander students are in community colleges (Figure 19.6). That is almost exactly the same proportion as Black students (39 percent).  CC's house 49 percent of Latinx students, 35 percent of white students, and 45 percent of Native American/Alaskan Native students. Public colleges and universities teach 76 percent of all students and 81 percent of Asian Americans. The well-being of public college instructors is far more important to national life than anything that happens at Harvard.



8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Some great points here, but could you clarify what you mean by this: "And yet even these NTT faculty teach 2-3 times more courses per year than TT faculty and are paid less." Do you think that someone who does not have a terminal degree, does not do research, and may not have even been hired through a nationally competitive search should make the same salary that you, a tenured professor who got your job once you proved to be nationally competitive as both a teacher and a researcher? Your statement made it seem as though the sheer number of courses a person teaches ought to determine their salary, even if the person teaching fewer courses has other responsibilities such as research/creative activities and service to university and the profession.

Susheel Chaudhary said...


If any you want take admission online courses BA BBA B.tech M.tech MBA Diploma in Engineering Distance Education Institute in Delhi Dubai Oman Kuwait Qatar Abu Dhabi India.

BBA Distance Education
Diploma Distance Education
Hotel Management Admission
LLB Distance Education
M.Pharma Distance Education admission
M.Tech Distance Education
MCA Distance Education
MBA Distance Education

Jakie ubrania są teraz modne said...

Good content, love your blog! Greetings from Poland!

Patanjali Bsnl said...

patnjali
Great article

Alpha Assignment Help said...

Great work did by you. Informative and problem-solving content that users can easily digest can work for all types of blogs. When a user finds something informative on a blog, he/she is more likely to come back from your side.
Business Plan Assignment Help

custom essay writing service said...

Excellent blog post about a relevant topic. Thanks a lot for sharing this useful information. It really helped me to get more about discrimination against Asian American applicants.

Lina Tan said...

Ayo Kakak Semuanya,
Yuk iseng bermain game untuk mendapatkan uang tambahan setiap harinya Hanya di HobiQQ.
Modal Kecil Dapat Puluhan Juta ^^
Bareng aku dan teman-temanku yang cantik-cantik loh !
Info Situs HobiQQ :
BBM : DD09567B
WA : +6281262400720
LINE : hobi-qq
Facebook : Lina Tan


Kunjungi Juga :
Agen Bandarq
Agen Bandarq Online
Agen Dominoqq
Agen Domino99
Agen Poker Terbaik
Situs Bandarq Online
Judi Online Terbesar
Artikel Unik dan Menarik
Hobi Baca Artikel
Artikel Menarik
Cerita Dewasa Terlengkap

Dr Purva Pius said...

Hello Everybody,
My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of $250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of $250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius,via email:(urgentloan22@gmail.com) Thank you.

Join the Conversation

Note: Firefox is occasionally incompatible with our comments section. We apologize for the inconvenience.