The members of the Reactivate the Berkeley Faculty Association endorse the "Week of Education" concerning the budget crisis. We encourage all faculty to find ways to participate in it. There are many possibilities, ranging from holding in-class discussions with students about the nature of the crisis and possible solutions to it, to taking part in walk outs, and attending the rallies, seminars, colloquiums, and other activities planned for this week.
In our view, these activities are not about disrupting classes or bringing the campus to a standstill. Rather, they are opportunities to educate our students, ourselves, and the public about the structural problems in state government and public culture that have undermined California's capacity to support broad student access to affordable, excellent public higher education. This week affords opportunities for us to examine and discuss these challenges and to debate the pros and cons of different ways to move the university to a more sustainable future.
We applaud our friends in SAVE and the Solidarity Working Group and all the other faculty, staff, and students involved in organizing the Week of Education.
Wendy Brown
Judith Butler
Tony Cascardi
Louise Fortmann
Waldo Martin
Chris Rosen
Alex Saragoza
Anne Wagner
Dick Walker
- Research Website
- Why I Restarted This Blog
Christopher Newfield
UC Daily Links
Book
Chicago Tribune review | Chronicle of Higher Ed interview
The Atlantic article | SB Independent articles 1 and 2
LARB review | John McGowan review | Decasia review
Radical Teacher review | Salon analysis | Public Books review
Future Trends interview | Full Stop interview pt 1 and 2
symplokē review | Change Magazine review
Frequent Labels
Labels
- ACCJC vs. CCSF (1)
- Academic Freedom (57)
- Academic Labor (57)
- Academic Senate (29)
- Admin Responses (154)
- Administrative Overreach (22)
- Affordability (27)
- Athletics (5)
- Austerity (45)
- Budget (297)
- Cal State (28)
- California (49)
- Campus Safety (33)
- Closures (2)
- Community College (12)
- Cooper Union (1)
- Corruption (5)
- Costs (71)
- Crisis (152)
- Cuts (110)
- Development (19)
- Discrimination (8)
- Diversity (7)
- Economy (7)
- Employee Benefits (39)
- Faculty (98)
- Financial Aid (13)
- For-Profit (9)
- Funding Model (131)
- Furlough (12)
- Future University (27)
- Governance (64)
- Graduates (10)
- Humanities (32)
- Income (33)
- Inequality (44)
- International (19)
- Isla Vista Shootings (3)
- Janet Napolitano (38)
- Jerry Brown (43)
- K-12 (2)
- Liberal Arts (15)
- Management (49)
- Margaret Spellings (2)
- Mark Yudof (19)
- November 2009 (1)
- Online Education (42)
- Pension (19)
- Politics (71)
- Privatization (42)
- Protests (79)
- Public Funding (93)
- Public vs. Private (76)
- Quality (27)
- Race (24)
- Religion & Culture (5)
- Research (34)
- STEM (10)
- Shared Governance (37)
- Steven Salaita (6)
- Strategies & Goals (59)
- Students (61)
- Tenure (10)
- Transparency (15)
- Tuition Hikes (28)
- UC (243)
- UC Berkeley (39)
- UC Care (18)
- UC Davis (17)
- UC Irvine (4)
- UC Los Angeles (6)
- UC Regents (81)
- UC Riverside (11)
- UC Santa Barbara (25)
- UCOF (21)
- UCOP (64)
- Unions (19)
- University of Missouri (1)
- University of Wisconsin System (8)
- Vegara vs. California (1)
All Posts
All Posts
-
▼
2009
(216)
-
▼
September
(22)
- Mark Yudof Says Yes-No to UC's Public Option
- UC Systemwide Protest Roundup
- We Are All Corpses Now?
- An Argument Against Abolishing The Master Plan
- There is NO Alternative
- UCSB Day of Action Sept 24
- Saying the Thing that is Not
- Berkeley Faculty Group Endorses Week of Education
- Day of Action at UCI
- Video of UC Berkeley Teach-In on the State of UC
- Mark Yudof's Budget Remarks at UC Regents Meeting
- Starving the State of California?
- UC Student Association Endorses Walkout
- The Fee Hike Shoe Drops
- Schwarzenegger Tax Commission Proposals: Will They...
- Non-resident tuition: “profit” = revenues - costs
- Notes on the UC Commission's First Meeting
- Regents Commission's First Speaker: Overview of th...
- No Confidence Vote is of Landslide Proportions
- Cuts and UC's Core Values: UCB Prof. Catherine M Cole
- Can Doubling Out-of-State Students Save Berkeley's...
- A Trickle Rising River of Layoffs
-
▼
September
(22)
Blogroll
- Academic Jobs Wiki
- Calitics
- Campaign for the Public University (UK)
- Changing Universities
- Citizen of Somewhere Else (SUNY Issues)
- Cloudminder
- Critical Education (UK)
- Easily Distracted (Timothy Burke)
- Edu-Factory
- Exquisite Life (UK)
- Higher Ed Watch
- Higher Education - The Guardian (UK)
- Homeless Adjunct
- Humanities Think Talk
- In Socrates' Wake
- Keep California's Promise
- Magna Charta Observatory (Bologna)
- New Deal for the Humanities
- New Faculty Majority
- Occupy Colleges
- Postgraduate Worker (UK)
- PrawfsBlawg
- Quality Public Higher Education
- Recession Realities in Higher Education Blog
- Reclaim UC
- Reclamations
- Sciences Carré Blog (France)
- Student Activism
- Texas Tribune - Higher Ed
- The California Professor
- The Quick and the Ed
- UC Faculty Supporting Students
- UC Pay Search Tool
- UCLA Faculty Association Blog
- Universitas (France)
- University Diaries (Margaret Soltan)
- University of Oregon Matters
- University Probe
- We Are Not Rats (Scotland)
6 comments:
Your view is shockingly passive. Do you not realize that if we don't "disrupt classes" on Sept 24, there may literally be fewer classes to disrupt in the near future? Do you not understand that this administration will dissolve departments and layoff faculty?
bronwen, maybe your disruptive intent is shockingly naive?
One of the problems with anonymous comments, as I have pointed out to Chris, is that civil discourse tends to suffer when commentators hide behind anonymity. This was the case with the snide comments made about Andrew Scull in an earlier post, and it is the case here. I may not agree with Bronwen's comment, but I don't think that snideness is a productive way to address her concerns.
I second Jack, and add that pseudonyms would be much appreciated so the anons don't blend into an undifferentiated mass
But wasn't it the Rowlands comment that first attacked the original post as "nor realizing" and "not understanding"?
As I understood it, the Rowlands comment (signed by a real person, mind you) was making the point that the moderate stance of the Berkeley Faculty Group was insufficient. Not in those terms, certainly, but that was the point Bronwen was making. There is a serious tactical point to debate here -- one that has been bracketed for the sake of faculty/student/staff unity. I may not agree with how Bronwen put it, but I understand what she is trying to say: namely, that a retreat from calling this "action" on 9/24 a walkout might harm the ultimate cause of demonstrating to UCOP and the state how these cutbacks affect the university campuses. Bronwen is commenting on tactics; your comment seems directed at Bronwen. With all respect, I think that the difference lies there.
I think we readers of this site are all concerned with the future of UC. I'd ask that commenting be an act of moving the argument forwards.
Join the Conversation
Note: Firefox is occasionally incompatible with our comments section. We apologize for the inconvenience.