May 7, 2013
An Open Letter to California
State Legislators
Dear CA State Legislators,
As a parent and a UC professor, I feel compelled to urge you
to reject the SB 520 bill being presented to you by Darrell Steinberg. Please
fund the Community Colleges and the California
State Universities
and the University
of California properly:
that way you can help guarantee access to quality education. By mandating the
use of on-line general education courses for public higher education, you put
the entire system of public higher education at risk.
In education, there are no quick fixes: solutions such as SB
520 can cause long-lasting damage. Universities have been already been
seriously weakened by years of budget cuts and administrative bloat. Real
change, however, can only happen come through the implementation of ground-up
reforms.
Our students need more interaction with real-life
professors: they don’t need more screen time.
The Internet is an amazing resource for research and learning, but more
screen time for young people is not a substitute for rich pedagogical
experiences. Students need more contact with professors and their peers in an
information saturated media ecology. They need quality experiences with on-line
education as supplements not substitutes for real life classroom experience.
Although SB 520 has been amended to protect public funds
from private exploitation, the provisions are weak at best. Case in point: California spends
millions of dollars a year buying STAR tests from the ETS. A rampant assessment
emphasis in public education has provided a windfall for secretive, privately
run organizations like ETS. ,Next, week, my son - like millions of Californian
schoolchildren - will be taking standardized tests that may or may not provide
accurate assessments of his academic achievements and aptitudes. Star testing was implemented as part of an
accountability regime in K-12 education. It has produced mixed results in terms
of actually improving the California
public school system. Class sizes in public schools meanwhile have ballooned.
Technological solutions to social problems are dangerous
panacea disguising the real cause of the problems we face – shrinking budgets
for the University’s core mission of undergraduate education. Cynical
administrative moves to disguise economic chicanery are not the solution.
As Diane Ravitch has written, “American education has a long
history of infatuation with fads and ill-considered ideas. The current
obsession with making our schools work like a business may be the worst of
them.” (222)
SB 520 deplores the fact that so many of our students cannot
get into courses to complete their degrees in a timely fashion. However, this
is a problem that the three segments of public higher education in California do not have
to the same extent. The UC faces that problem much less than the community
colleges. Inversely, SB520 drives those in the UC, CSU, and the CCs who already
developed their own hybrid technology-enhanced education into shot-gun
marriages with for-profit providers, thus funneling public funds into private
enterprise hands.. The present crisis is not some kind of natural disaster,
like an earthquake. The crisis of access is entirely man-made!
Every undergraduate program on my campus has been cut to the
bone: our core missions are compromised every day by budget cuts. Cal State,
Community College and UC students represent a broad cross section of the
population of California. Our students don’t deserve
access to on-line education approved or not by CA faculty. They don’t deserve a
virtual University -- they deserve a
real one. They need more access to professors, to content and to pedagogical
situations that challenge and move them.
Please listen to the students. Time and again students
across the state have insisted publicly that they neither need nor want more
online education. Nor do they want state funds to go to for-profit and
pseudo-not-for-profit vendors. Our students want a good education. Please leave
it to those most engaged in public higher education to determine how
technology-enhanced delivery can work to improve the classroom experience.
Please vote against SB 520. Please restore the UC, Cal State
and Community College budgets so that we can continue to provide access to all
of California’s
college students.
Yours truly,
Catherine Liu
Professor, Film and Media Studies
Director, UC Irvine Humanities Collective
UC Irvine
3 comments:
She has said it all except to add: that science hands on experience can not be even approached online; that having a paper read and discussed by a real professor is not something you can get online - even with a chat room - I tried to give my students this and it did not wot work nearly a well as sitting one on one in my office on campus.. At all levels, education is best with one teacher and just a few students. Education has got to be the wave o the future, mot of the past.
Very, very well said. Just one thing--I am sensitized by Lakeoff's discussion of "framing"--how important the concepts & terms we use are. We should be careful not to use the lingo of the right, or at least to negate it. (Sorry if I'm niggling)
"Technological solutions to social problems are dangerous panacea "
-->Technological pseudo-solutions to social problems are no panacea but dangerous because they disguise"
H Marcuse point taken, except I'm not quite sure what my use of the lingo of the right is, but I'm all for the refine of formulations. "pseudo- solution" is good.
Join the Conversation
Note: Firefox is occasionally incompatible with our comments section. We apologize for the inconvenience.