60,000 UC Union Members Call for Vote of No Confidence in Yudof (from UC-AFT)
WHEREAS University of California (UC) President Mark Yudof has declared his intention to force crippling cuts on UC’s vital services and programs, and
WHEREAS the furloughs, layoffs , and student fee increases proposed by President Yudof are unnecessary and extremely harmful to the University and its public service mission, and
WHEREAS as recently as July 2009, UC’s strong AA1/AA bond rating was reaffirmed by Moody’s Investors Service, and UC’s Medical Centers reported a strong 5.2% operating margin and $171 million in profits for the three quarters ending March 31, 2009,and
WHEREAS UC has consistently refused to comply with state law in making transparent its financial transactions, and
WHEREAS the University, as a leading institution of higher education and a recipient of American Reinvestment and Recovery Act funds, is expected to reign in fraud, waste, and abuse, including excessive executive compensation, and
WHEREAS Roughly 3,600 UC employees earn over $200,000 in yearly salary, Chancellors currently earn an average of 22% more than their predecessors, and President Yudof earns nearly 200% more than his predecessor, and
WHEREAS President Yudof’s planned solution to decreased State General Fund appropriations bars high-wage University employees from contributing a balanced share to the budget solution, while deliberately placing thousands of vulnerable low-wage Californians at risk, and
WHEREAS Yudof’s plan fails, at the expense of vital services, to redistribute over $220 million in savings to the University by reasonably reducing spending on UC employees who gross over $200,000 annually, and
WHEREAS we see at University of California a profound crisis of principles and priorities, and we have a duty to act in unity to preserve our University and the services we provide to the people of
California,
LET IT BE HEREBY RESOLVED THAT the University of California Union Coalition calls for a Vote of No Confidence in President Yudof, commencing on August 26 and concluding on September 3.
[Signed by California Nurses Association, UPTE, UAW, AFSCME, CUE, AFT]
- Research Website
- Why I Restarted This Blog
Christopher Newfield
UC Daily Links
Book
Chicago Tribune review | Chronicle of Higher Ed interview
The Atlantic article | SB Independent articles 1 and 2
LARB review | John McGowan review | Decasia review
Radical Teacher review | Salon analysis | Public Books review
Future Trends interview | Full Stop interview pt 1 and 2
symplokē review | Change Magazine review
Frequent Labels
Labels
- ACCJC vs. CCSF (1)
- Academic Freedom (57)
- Academic Labor (57)
- Academic Senate (29)
- Admin Responses (154)
- Administrative Overreach (22)
- Affordability (27)
- Athletics (5)
- Austerity (45)
- Budget (297)
- Cal State (28)
- California (49)
- Campus Safety (33)
- Closures (2)
- Community College (12)
- Cooper Union (1)
- Corruption (5)
- Costs (71)
- Crisis (152)
- Cuts (110)
- Development (19)
- Discrimination (8)
- Diversity (7)
- Economy (7)
- Employee Benefits (39)
- Faculty (98)
- Financial Aid (13)
- For-Profit (9)
- Funding Model (131)
- Furlough (12)
- Future University (27)
- Governance (64)
- Graduates (10)
- Humanities (32)
- Income (33)
- Inequality (44)
- International (19)
- Isla Vista Shootings (3)
- Janet Napolitano (38)
- Jerry Brown (43)
- K-12 (2)
- Liberal Arts (15)
- Management (49)
- Margaret Spellings (2)
- Mark Yudof (19)
- November 2009 (1)
- Online Education (42)
- Pension (19)
- Politics (71)
- Privatization (42)
- Protests (79)
- Public Funding (93)
- Public vs. Private (76)
- Quality (27)
- Race (24)
- Religion & Culture (5)
- Research (34)
- STEM (10)
- Shared Governance (37)
- Steven Salaita (6)
- Strategies & Goals (59)
- Students (61)
- Tenure (10)
- Transparency (15)
- Tuition Hikes (28)
- UC (243)
- UC Berkeley (39)
- UC Care (18)
- UC Davis (17)
- UC Irvine (4)
- UC Los Angeles (6)
- UC Regents (81)
- UC Riverside (11)
- UC Santa Barbara (25)
- UCOF (21)
- UCOP (64)
- Unions (19)
- University of Missouri (1)
- University of Wisconsin System (8)
- Vegara vs. California (1)
All Posts
All Posts
-
▼
2009
(216)
-
▼
August
(45)
- What's the Matter with UCOP?
- UCSB Call for Campus Response to UCOP Furlough Ruling
- UCOP Mandate Morally and Politically Unacceptable
- UC Berkeley Shortens Teaching Term
- The Faculty Stands Alone
- UCOP on Furloughs: We're the Deciders!
- Chris Newfield in Chronicle not today but some ten...
- From UC-AFT: Call for No Confidence Vote
- Turn it around; don’t give it away: AAUP Statement...
- Letter to Gary Strong, UCLA University Librarian
- And Sometimes We Get Boethian Dream Visions
- University of North Carolina Administration Grows ...
- on-line education, the 11th campus
- Who Are the High Earners in the UC System (x-post)
- Byron Williams: University of California Regents d...
- We Get Letters: UCSC Loses Its Child Care
- University of Southern Miss is considering the eli...
- Should Berkeley Be Michigan? Dialgoue on Privatiza...
- Emerging Furlough Standards and Goals
- I Have Some Questions
- Sign Up Time
- The Economist Takes Notice
- Option Four Videos of Yudof Q & A and Lisa Hajjar ...
- CSU Chancellor in SF Chronicle
- News from the Santa Barbara Yudof Protests
- Robert Samuels' blog, "Changing Universities"
- SF Chronicle: Execs Still Get Raises
- Recession Realities in Higher Education
- Indeed, "what of the children?"
- So...what business are we in again?
- We Sometimes Get Letters Addressed to Other People
- Show Me the Money
- Another great piece by Jeffrey Wasserstrom
- UC / CSU budget cuts from Associated Press (correc...
- Option 4: 1st Annual Bad Business Award
- Please read Gerry's 2nd comment in previous post
- The Real Reasons to Support Language Study
- We Get Letters: On Dean Edley's Distance Learning ...
- From CUCFA: Legal Update on The Emergency
- Robert Williams: Press Conference Statement (7/29)
- Robert Samuels: Giving Up on Education at UCLA?
- Option 4: Follow the Money
- Marc Bousquet on the Rise of the Executive Class i...
- Michael Meranze, "Jefferson's Epitaph"
- Charlie Schartz, "Do Public Colleges Rip Off Stude...
-
▼
August
(45)
Blogroll
- Academic Jobs Wiki
- Calitics
- Campaign for the Public University (UK)
- Changing Universities
- Citizen of Somewhere Else (SUNY Issues)
- Cloudminder
- Critical Education (UK)
- Easily Distracted (Timothy Burke)
- Edu-Factory
- Exquisite Life (UK)
- Higher Ed Watch
- Higher Education - The Guardian (UK)
- Homeless Adjunct
- Humanities Think Talk
- In Socrates' Wake
- Keep California's Promise
- Magna Charta Observatory (Bologna)
- New Deal for the Humanities
- New Faculty Majority
- Occupy Colleges
- Postgraduate Worker (UK)
- PrawfsBlawg
- Quality Public Higher Education
- Recession Realities in Higher Education Blog
- Reclaim UC
- Reclamations
- Sciences Carré Blog (France)
- Student Activism
- Texas Tribune - Higher Ed
- The California Professor
- The Quick and the Ed
- UC Faculty Supporting Students
- UC Pay Search Tool
- UCLA Faculty Association Blog
- Universitas (France)
- University Diaries (Margaret Soltan)
- University of Oregon Matters
- University Probe
- We Are Not Rats (Scotland)
5 comments:
Right on!
Right off - this is a terrible idea. I don't agree with everything Yudof is done but he's not the enemy here - its the legislature that funds or doesn't fund. Having a different chancellor would do NOTHING to change what the legislature will give us.
True,
however calling for a vote of no confidence will in turn force Yudof to put pressure on the legislature and stop taking the cuts laying down.
A vote of no confidence would not give Yudof any additional leverage to "pressure" the legislature. It will just undermind his authority and give him LESS sway in Sacramento.
Thanks so much for the article, quite effective information.
play games
Join the Conversation
Note: Firefox is occasionally incompatible with our comments section. We apologize for the inconvenience.